Search for: All records

Biased AI models result in unfair decisions. In response, a number of algorithmic solutions have been engineered to mitigate bias, among which the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) has been studied, to an extent. Although the SMOTE technique and its variants have great potentials to help improve fairness, there is little theoretical justification for its success. In addition, formal error and fairness bounds are not clearly given. This paper attempts to address both issues. We prove and demonstrate that synthetic data generated by oversampling underrepresented groups can mitigate algorithmic bias in AI models, while keeping the predictive errors bounded. We further compare this technique to the existing state-of-the-art fair AI techniques on five datasets using a variety of fairness metrics. We show that this approach can effectively improve fairness even when there is a significant amount of label and selection bias, regardless of the baseline AI algorithm. 

Conventional wisdom holds that discrimination in machine learning is a result of historical discrimination: biased training data leads to biased models. We show that the reality is more nuanced; machine learning can be expected to induce types of bias not found in the training data. In particular, if different groups have different optimal models, and the optimal model for one group has higher accuracy, the optimal accuracy joint model will induce disparate impact even when the training data does not display disparate impact. We argue that due to systemic bias, this is a likely situation, and simply ensuring training data appears unbiased is insufficient to ensure fair machine learning. 

A library of soft, stretchable, strain-insensitive bioelectronics was made using brittle interfacial materials.